A place for talking about the Ethereum Virtual Machine on Farcaster.

We really need to come to a standard on how bundlers simulate transactions for account abstraction.

It’s critical for features like pay fee in ERC20 that open up new models into tokenomics.

The ethereum foundation won’t take a stance on this. A leader must rise up to this challenge.

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist.

http://opacity.network

Advisor @ EV3 Ventures

I think the logic is that since the bundler is paying for initial execution, it’s on them to simulate accurately however they wish since they’re taking on that risk?

The industry might choose one by default based on which bundler library ends up dominating (likely Stackup or Alchemy)

Right, and so each Paymaster by necessity has to have a bundler that trusts it, they basically share a trusted computing base. Is this complaint motivated by a paymaster designer feeling they have to get bundlers to adopt them?