A place for talking about the Ethereum Virtual Machine on Farcaster.

We really need to come to a standard on how bundlers simulate transactions for account abstraction.

It’s critical for features like pay fee in ERC20 that open up new models into tokenomics.

The ethereum foundation won’t take a stance on this. A leader must rise up to this challenge.

I’m not sure I understand. What do you see as missing with the current 4337 bundling spec https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337#bundling. What’s missing from the bundler implementations we have today like alto https://github.com/pimlicolabs/alto and voltaire https://github.com/candidelabs/voltaire?

Working on building products with zkTLS. A ruthless empiricist.

http://opacity.network

Advisor @ EV3 Ventures

https://hackmd.io/@Vid201/aa-bundler-rust

Take a look at the write up for this implementation of AA.

Building pods.media to help you collect conversations.

I think the logic is that since the bundler is paying for initial execution, it’s on them to simulate accurately however they wish since they’re taking on that risk?

The industry might choose one by default based on which bundler library ends up dominating (likely Stackup or Alchemy)