Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Massive Overton Window shifting events create massive new surface areas for opportunity. Will be a chaotic, weird and exhausting year. Buckle up.
29 replies
85 recasts
407 reactions

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
I’m not sure memecoins is the shift we want. It was supposed to be crypto reserves and institutional DeFi. Those things can last and be positive-sum.
1 reply
0 recast
22 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The shift is “everything that can be a token will be a token”. Memecoins are just the beginning. This will force regulatory overhaul in US which is the single biggest thing holding back crypto as an industry right now.
2 replies
6 recasts
53 reactions

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
rugpulls don’t help regulatory reform. BitConnect was not good for the industry. Luna was not good for the industry. Not every popular crypto program ends up positive for the industry.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
how is $trump a rugpull? use specific examples please
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
no other reason for 80% lockup on a memecoin with no utility than to sell from the vast pool you FOMO convinced a bunch of other people to pour their money into and that you own most access shares to this logic applies even with a lockup period. the only caveat would be if they add utility to it before substantial lockups expire
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Maxbrain Capital pfp
Maxbrain Capital
@viybz
no reason to rug when you have an FDV of $60B...you essentially do anything in your power not to rug? but maybe idk what im talking about.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
They aren't just going to leave the money sitting there - the token does not represent some value-added process or means of exchange for work done. They either add utility to it or it's just a giant pot of everyone's dollars and it's a game as to whom withdraws first while gambling that the pot could get bigger.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
so because they will sell their allocation it’s a “rugpull”? following that logic, every VC-backed project of the last several years is also a rugpull.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
If you personally get people to put a bunch of money in a pot and then withdraw most of the funds for yourself they better be investing in some other value-added work you’re doing that you gave them shares in or it’s a rugpull, fast or slow.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
I don’t think you can apply value investing frameworks to attention markets like memecoins, apples and oranges and your use of the term “rugpull”, which means a specific thing, is way too broad imo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction