sean on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

sean pfp

i still can’t believe he’s the one who made the dog one and acted like the timing of the superanon pfp change was a coincidence

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

woj ツ pfp

it was, feel free to tag next time — everything is in open https://www.supercast.xyz/c/0xa0670df3461032a65c864ef4d098280f3508551e

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

sean pfp

dude you went from saying $ANON is dope and "i will continue enforcing the 'no token' rule on superanon" [1] to (six hours later) changing the superanon pfp [2] and launching a competing token that same day. fans bought $ANON during that period as the community token. you mentioned the zora mint [1], but a competing token was unexpected until you posted about your own token killing the one your fans had been buying [4] a lot of fans bought OG $ANON as the community token— truly anonymous, and with your $ANON distribution we thought you were supportive. we were excited b/c we care about supercast— i've personally tipped you hundreds of thousands of $DEGEN and have been a subscriber from the beginning b/c i believed you were building what was best for the community. it was just not a cool series of events, man. long live $ANON [1] https://warpcast.com/woj.eth/0x358b119a [2] https://warpcast.com/superanon/0x514609b1 [3] https://warpcast.com/superanon/0x2a81bd7b [4] https://warpcast.com/woj.eth/0x6bc4fa4f

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

woj ツ pfp

1) i appreciate your support 2) you seem to have a very strong opinion based on the wrong facts and misunderstanding i appreciate you as a user and member of the community so just sent you a link to cal for a 15 minute catch up

1 reply

1 recast

8 reactions

sean pfp

it's on the calendar. for what it's worth, i do think there is plenty of room for a non-feature-specific @super token. the community would only ever recognize an app-level token if it came from you officially.

1 reply

1 recast

5 reactions

woj ツ pfp

context on the "token launch" - $anon was never supposed be a memecoin - it was supposed be a $10 zora mint airdropped to supercast users - then @jacob advised me to use zora standard model that makes it into an erc20 after mint - then next day someone launched $ANON - i had to deal with this (i think i did ok) - had to decide if i follow with my plans or not - decided that im going to let randoms on the internet influence my plans and launched the rebrand and the zora mint anyway - which made people angry - and then on top of that people discovered that the zora mint converted into erc-20 and started buying it as a competitor to $ANON between all of this is a ton of shit that went down in private from large $ANON holders who essentially tried to capture @superanon and a year of my work just because $ANON took of and has good vibes could i do everything better? sure but i think i did my best with all the shit that went down independently

8 replies

11 recasts

55 reactions

woj ツ pfp

- decided that im *not* going to let randoms on the internet influence my plans and launched the rebrand and the zora mint anyway

1 reply

1 recast

16 reactions

sean pfp

since my cast was caught up in your recast of this thread, i'll just add that i think the central component that caused the confusion was the choice to discard the "?" superanon pfp so quickly not only had people become attached to the "?", but the new one didn't seem to fit the brand, and even with the mint felt like a reaction. everyone was only left with assumptions to fill in the gaps superanons, and now ANONs are your friends just expressing their opinions. we care about the @super product and brand and are excited to see you experiment with things other clients aren't doing

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

androidsixteen pfp

@androidsixteen.eth

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction