Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
⚡STIICKZ⚡
@stiickz
Am I reading this correctly? You are nerfed for having more followers? New accounts are basically incentivized?
8 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions
💧
@swim
kinda I created a new account to test this theory it got nowhere unless a popular account is interacting with you. if you do have a lot of followers but regular interactions; yup nerfed happy i lost 6k followers.. it improved my score by 50% 💀
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Ryan
@ryanhube.eth
Makes sense from some recent high scores I’ve seen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
herbaycity.base.eth
@herbaycity
I noticed I lost almost 800 followers too.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
It's (somewhat) normalizing relative to number of followers. It's more that huge accounts don't have a disproportionate advantage over smaller accounts. I don't think new/small accounts are advantaged over big accounts.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
amc
@amc
True They seem to mess with the algo a bit week over week but definitely some priority for new users/users with a smaller following
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nate “Igor” Smith 🎩
@drivenbyboredom
1) One of the biggest complaint about Farcaster is that people have no engagement compared to their Twitter following, so incentivizing new accounts seems ideal 2) If you are new and a bunch of your followers are vibing with you, that's a better sign of engagement than if you have a bunch of followers and no one cares about your casts. I will say it should be adjusted by ACTIVE followers, because people are being punished for being followed by people who aren't here anymore cc @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Uin
@uin
Wht it this
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
