I’m not a fan of content coins but CT’s arguments are so superficial that it all falls apart if the price goes up

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

I’m still a believer in the pre-corporate remastering definition of based

Thank god for those first 7 words.. for a second I thought you had become fully based

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

The ticker is $MIGGLES
  (˚Д 。7
 I LOVE YOU
Based Onchain Degen
Sophisticated Market Participant
1st Place in Framedl-pro once

Snipers gonna snipe. Highly doubt it was an inside job

This is what happens when you start coins at $20 market cap 💀

Someone had 25% of this and they dumped it, that's not superficial. Completely tone-deaf response from @jessepollak, that's not superficial. Only a short while after the Venice vvv launch scam, they're like Bankless. Grift, wait a bit, repeat. I'm saddened and disillusioned

whether the price fluctuates up or down [temporarily] does not change my opinion that the system is not designed well for creators today

never reason from a price change (econ 101)

Except they doesn’t, it could have launched at this price and avoided a sniper walking away with $300k and added to the culture of aping every tweet by launching it in a that’s fair

Bump 👇

sniping never exists to benefit retail or do a fair launch

we've known how to do that for ages, eg slow dutch auction

the reason to do degen-style launches is because the launchers are addicted to the high &amp; marketing caused by the extractive pump. nothing to do with fairness

🤖

Except they doesn’t, it could have launched at this price and avoided a sniper walking away with $300k and added to the culture of aping every tweet by launching it in a that’s fair

Bump 👇
https://x.com/phildaian/status/1891482841000607930?s=46

They get validated when it goes the other way though.