tomato pfp

tomato

@tomatoxyz

232 Following
37 Followers
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
Clone wars (and they all seem to have 200+ followers)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
It should also be noted that on some platforms relative "nobodies" pay extensively for either adspace or artificial likes/comments/followers at quite a significant scale which just adds to the pyramid. Even larger and more established users pay for the same thing.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
"Once again, ATF had made the mistake they had with the Kelly press of complacently taking profits from a successful product, not investing in improvements, and eventually seeing this product become irretrievably overtaken by the competition." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Type_Founders
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
This is awesome!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
I'll add to this by also mentioning miniapps or any dApps that hide stuff away until you sign up or do some form of TX. You should be able to browse through an app/mini-app freely to understand its purpose before signing or adding anything.
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
A very poignant question and "ownership" can be a very emotional concept. I don't think "I wrote the prompt for that" is going to result in a very strong emotional attachment. I would hazard a guess that the best craftsmen are attracted to doing what they do in large part because of the proud feeling of ownership of the work. There's also the time component involved in honing and using a skillset to produce work - if you can do it 10x faster, then presumably you'll have about as much ownership as a factory that pumps out cookie-cutter products at scale, which is to say very little.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
Currently reading BOOM: Bubbles and the End of Stagnation
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
A good question here is whether people that want to build and manage communities and incentivized to do so in any special way?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
How do people sleep 8 hours? I've had 2 nights in the past 90 days where I achieved this.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
This sounds suspiciously like you're defining spam... I get the point of what you're saying but when people just blast 100,000 things it becomes overwhelming in an attention economy and no one will want to pay attention anymore.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
The best (or worst) part about crypto before stables was that you could invest in altcoins that only had a BTC trading pair so you were effectively investing into both the altcoin and BTC at the same time. And from what I remember very many people used to make both bets simultaneously (not as many as there are in crypto, but relatively speaking a lot did)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
I just donated to help earthquake victims in Myanmar. Join me to support urgent relief efforts.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
bug: "read more" button/link on posts that when clicked doesn't actually show anything more request: "read more" but it opens inline on the desktop version of warpcast.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
Shit isn't serious until they tariff the internet
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
This makes me question if "mini apps" will one day have portability and be possible to embed elsewhere or solo launch on major app stores. I imagine it's totally possible since it's an open protocol, makes the future value prospect a lot more interesting.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
This too shall come to pass
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
I think people underestimate the challenges with meaningfully incentivizing users on a network as large as Twitter. There's already millions of preexisting bot accounts just for spam and sentiment manipulation. The amount of sybil attacks they get with their current restrictive incentive system are hugely substantial already. Guaranteed if they flipped the switch and loosened the incentive restrictions to work with almost all accounts people would be complaining about the nature of content and the type of users far louder than they already are - because even heavily restrictive incentives for Twitter posters degraded the type and quality of content substantially.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
What if the financial products are the shock and awe?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
Base is for this image that has an incredible amount of white space surrounding it and blinds me temporarily each time I see one on the timeline.
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
tomato pfp
tomato
@tomatoxyz
If you have seriously good models for these, I assume you'd just keep them private and charge by time/size of input? A person looking for legal advice or consulting stuff isn't going to understand GPU tokens well compared to "$3 for 10 responses" etc. But maybe I'm wrong - either way if you have a great model and lock it down then you can charge however you want to.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions