Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
is it practical to use blockchain for payments? https://x.com/dystopiabreaker/status/1824015899868962939
31 replies
3 recasts
55 reactions
limone.eth πŸ‹ pfp
limone.eth πŸ‹
@limone.eth
@fluidkey solves this cc @moritz @metony @frenk
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
Practical, yes. But extremely unsafe for society to use unshielded USDT. Sadly, most people in this space are far more interested in becoming rich than worrying about the harm it will bring to many if widely adopted. Unfortunately it is also extremely risky to ship a privacy layer in this regulatory environment.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
kk pfp
kk
@king
quilibrium fixes this
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨 pfp
MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨
@metaend.eth
You can hate it, but sending usdc or eurc with no tx fees via coinbase wallet is a little game changer. Especially with on/off ramping inside
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
HH pfp
HH
@hamud
a lot of people outside of the west mainly use tron and USDT for payments, its very easy and popular to use.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mantej Rajpal πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ pfp
Mantej Rajpal πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@mantej.eth
Not practical until privacy is built in. Railgun has been making moves here, private transitions on Ethereum β€” hiding the sender, recipient, asset, and the amount of asset. v3 in the works with more DeFi integrations ✨ https://x.com/vitalikbuterin/status/1779845886224253369?s=46&t=dO0uo_CgV6MrB7N3NkVjDA
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
internet evolved from http to https expecting similar
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
its a feature and a bug - lots of interesting use cases as a result of apps being able to build on this data
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
can see a privacy layer enabling either short lived anon wallets conveniently or private txs
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
X ↑ FINDER pfp
X ↑ FINDER
@sface179
according to me that's a concerning trade-off for the convenience of tap to pay
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Miguelgarest pfp
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
Oh 😯. Suddenly onchain doesn't feel that good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾 pfp
Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾
@ariansh.eth
Tap to pay on Aztec
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
John Mean pfp
John Mean
@tatyana6pdhe
Interesting question. Due to the regulations the privacy might be harder to achieve. Maybe it should be our primary goal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shadow06 pfp
Shadow06
@shadow06
No, BTC and ETH are racing to be the CBDC
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zoro☠️⚑⚑⚑⚑ pfp
Zoro☠️⚑⚑⚑⚑
@rolex0
"Yes, blockchain for payments is practical, offering security and transparency, though transaction speed and costs vary."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wen 🎩 pfp
Wen 🎩
@wenedy
Absolutely I think blockchain payments is the future!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Toan pfp
Toan
@toannd
Yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MeTony πŸ’§πŸ”‘ pfp
MeTony πŸ’§πŸ”‘
@metony
Privacy is the #1 priority for this space. That's it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Archilles ΰΌ„ pfp
Archilles ΰΌ„
@archilles
Not really sure about this But I’m keeping an open mind
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction