The latest "Gemini" debacle is a make or break moment for Google. Either they pull a @barmstrong internal power move (better late than never) or they'll slowly fade into irrelevance. 

The role of companies is NOT to push political agenda.

The latest "Gemini" debacle is a make or break moment for Google. Either they pull a @barmstrong internal power move (better late than never) or they'll slowly fade into irrelevance. 

The role of companies is NOT to push political agenda.
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1761731253764579573

co-founder at fairmint.com.
If you're a FF (Farcaster Founder) raising funds, stop right here and checkout fairmint.com. Or DC me :)

funny you bring up the coinbase comparison because i was just thinking about this a different way

google is keeping safety as the highest priority similar to how coinbase kept safety + compliance as the priority. 

and i don't see this as google pushing political ideology as much as it's overindexing on being 'safe'.

How is this related to safety? There’s a difference between AI ethics and AI safety.

i think they overlap more than you think. safety is more about preventing harm imo but to also make for a welcoming space for everyone.

totally agree. it's just the information with LLMs can be presented with such seeming authority that there needs to be some moderation imo. 

perhaps 'making a welcoming space' isn't the right phrase. more so a 'safe space' for everyone using and everyone downstream from it's consumption.

I seriously doubt "make a welcoming space for everyone" should be a goal when it comes to information retrieval. They should strive to be as objective as possible, while highlighting the different viewpoints that exists on a particular topic, with the aim to provide the most complete and balanced answers.