A proposal to implement a dynamic rent approach to channels that would: 
* improve user experience
* limit name squatting & extortion
* increase app creators revenues

Let me know what you guys think!

A proposal to implement a dynamic rent approach to channels that would: 
* improve user experience
* limit name squatting & extortion
* increase app creators revenues

Let me know what you guys think!
https://slideframe.replit.app/QmNyAmhU3TsUJMfQfT8sAyHoYFvF7r4SALMwWN3hubc2WH

Ethereum

co-founder at fairmint.com.
If you're a FF (Farcaster Founder) raising funds, stop right here and checkout fairmint.com. Or DC me :)

I generally like this idea and would love to see it in action, but I worry about 2%. For example, /ethereum has 78K followers, what's a reasonable price to set for something that is not monetized? $100/yr is $5,000 which is within realm of a troll purchase.

Maybe % adjusted down relative to # followers?

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

Currently: WhatsABI

Wouldn't that remove the efficacy against squatters?

Your comment (and others like the one of @vitalik.eth) made me realize I should have made clearer that, in my proposal, channel owners need to opt-in to use the harberger tax system. It's not imposed to them.

If you have a channel & you're actively using / maintaining it, you have not reason to opt-in to the HT system