Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
w-g
@w-g
Nouniverse poll: Are you planning on LPing $nouns? At what starting price? Don’t all raise your hand at once. if a fork 3 occurs I am afaict the only possible meaningful seed liquidity for this thing continue to scratch my head over why my perspective on how to do it properly is not being more actively sought
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g
@w-g
As designed, $nouns is mostly talk and little tech. disappointing because this could be really so revolutionary if done so that the full characteristics of noun ownership are inherited. This is possible! let’s not settle for an nft-x redeploy
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
seneca
@seneca
"mostly talk and little tech" - disappointing is you talking down on the efforts of others. there's so much that goes into doing any of this that goes unnoticed. re: gov: the spec clearly states that governance is something being considered by verbs for future versions hence upgradable contracts.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
What is being added beyond what is currently possible w nft-x ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
seneca
@seneca
feature wise - nothing that im aware of (and i believe that's intentional). provenance wise, everything. comparing the project to nftx is like comparing a dao mint to anyone else minting the same exact media. provenance matters.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
seneca
@seneca
to expect a full exploration of the design space in v1 is shortsighted imo. as alluded to in the spec, there's tons to do. but to do so in v1 is fork-esque scope that would (i imagine) takes many many months. personally for smaller steps so long as they are not critically risky to the core of nouns.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
while not directly core-existential, think without these features we are designing a retail trap. There’s no agency - no collectibility - && highly volatile liquidity . Will be hundreds/thousands of such cases
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
