Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Nouniverse poll: Are you planning on LPing $nouns? At what starting price? Don’t all raise your hand at once. if a fork 3 occurs I am afaict the only possible meaningful seed liquidity for this thing continue to scratch my head over why my perspective on how to do it properly is not being more actively sought
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
As designed, $nouns is mostly talk and little tech. disappointing because this could be really so revolutionary if done so that the full characteristics of noun ownership are inherited. This is possible! let’s not settle for an nft-x redeploy
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

seneca pfp
seneca
@seneca
"mostly talk and little tech" - disappointing is you talking down on the efforts of others. there's so much that goes into doing any of this that goes unnoticed. re: gov: the spec clearly states that governance is something being considered by verbs for future versions hence upgradable contracts.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Toady Hawk pfp
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
What do you think is missing from the current spec?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction