Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
seneca
@seneca
some thoughts on $nouns. any feedback is appreciated: https://x.com/cryptoseneca/status/1879282728862138598?s=46
6 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
Noun 839
@noun839.eth
Yes. This is the way.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
ns
@nickysap
My main question is, would the primary FT be $nouns? If so, there needs to be some serious consideration about supply acquisition and liquidity management I would think. If not, would the DAO then go for an officially mandated token?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
very bullish on a or many fungible tokens for Nouns. especially when we collectively make the shift towards programming it with loyalty mechanics: ways to earn and burn/spend the tokens within the ecosystem (and beyond).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
Agreed for a while was on the ⌐◨-◨ train cuz of voting but like you said adds complexity. Literally having exposure to $nouns even without voting is an unlock, so !wen??
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pierre ⌐◨-◨
@pierre-coetzee
Is this the contract? 0x0a93a7be7e7e426fc046e204c44d6b03a302b631
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ox.crypto 🌈
@ox-crypto.eth
What's the ca for nouns
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction