Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/flows
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rocketman
@rocketman
will build out a dashboard that shows a best guess at how well /flows is spending money 🤖 # of quality builders, verified impact, total spent etc. + removed grants and how much we spent on them what else should we show on this dashboard?
3 replies
2 recasts
15 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
would guess that our biggest loss is around new grants that didn't deliver after a few weeks. if confirmed - might explore some sort of lock on initial funding until 1 month is reached. what do folks think of this idea? could potentially unlock funding earlier if there's a minimum TCR staked on the project.
3 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
EZinCrypto
@ezincrypto
I think a 1 month lock is very very fair!! It gives the person time to get into the “flow” of things!! (no reason to fund a project that doesn’t even meet the requirements on month 1!Seems like that would be a big indicator it was only about the money and no passion driving them…) Just my 2 cents, also agree if there’s a stake, skin in the game, could unlock after 2 weeks, as long as they are “active”… I vote YES!!!!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gabriellago.musicaw3.eth
@gabriellagomusic
I like that idea! What happens to the funds if the protect is taken down before that month? Do they go back to the pool?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mono 🐵 🥌
@0xmonografia
it would be interesting to have info on curators, too: # of curators, flows challenged, rewards, etc. a deeper analysis of how builders<>curators are connected based on their social graph/on-chain activity might help to have an overview and inform of possible collusion (if any) and prevent rugs from first-time grantees 1-month lock sounds reasonable. minimum staked could work, too, but it would make sense for salaries higher than X amount
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
