Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
FID vs. OpenRank "Engagement" Ranking: - https://dune.com/queries/3901607 - *ridiculously heavily* skewed towards the earliest users of Farcast - Why? Because the algorithm starts off by selecting a trusted group of core users based on metrics heavily biased in favor of early users (see https://docs.openrank.com/integrations/farcaster/ranking-strategies-on-farcaster). - early users receive multiple boosts to engagement due to similar algorithms being used everywhere (e.g. Power Badge, Degen Tips), which results in a positive feedback loop. FID vs. Follower Count: - https://dune.com/queries/3901623/6557858 - nearly impossible for users who registered after a certain point to create the mega followings of the earliest users Why not use first cast or registration date? Dune's Neynar data doesn't have this <= 2023-09. If anybody has an alternative data source I can use on Dune, it would be much appreciated. Next: I investigate the degree of cliquiness in early users, if anybody is interested?
30 replies
14 recasts
70 reactions
y0b
@y0b
Why the big gap around 100k?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
an nft project grabbed a huge block of FIDs to sell later
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Oh no way, seems like I've been spreading false information 😳 for some reason I read it was a hub migration issue 500 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
maybe both happened? I remember someone admitting they grabbed a lot of fid's without paying for storage, like an optimistic pre-mint. It's possible that those FIDs are now stranded by later protocol decisions and smart contract migrations
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
