Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steen!!! pfp
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
Interesting question that reflects previous and current metas of the onchain creative economy. For @enjoytech.eth, we're forming thinking about three general personas: -Creators -Curators -Speculators Trouble is, these roles are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps then, it's not about defining personas from the perspective of roles, but actions: -Creating -Curating -Speculating When you frame the audience through action, it's much easier to create a reputation system tied to behaviors. Now, someone who identifies as an Artist or Collector can build reputation through creating and curating. Problems w/ curation: -Too few ways to do so -Poorly leveraged/surfaced via reputation systems -Poorly incentivized (big) The question shouldn't be which would you rather; there should be a variety of ways to curate with a variety of orders of financial magnitude. Whether I tip, bid, add to a gallery, share, or otherwise, it should be incentivized and measured.
2 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

Reid DeRamus pfp
Reid DeRamus
@reidtandy
We had a similar situation in trying to better understand writers vs readers — almost all writers are also readers, making it hard to draw boundaries between the two. We ended up talking about them more so as “modes”: people are sometimes in Writer mode, and other times in Reader mode, and what they want to do (say, within a product or on a given surface) depends on what mode they’re in.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steen!!! pfp
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
Oh hell yeah thank you for sharing Reid! Modes is a great framework. Would love to hear more about how this resolved through your product strategy if you're open to sharing publicly or privately
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction