Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
875 followers 👀
18 replies
3 recasts
58 reactions
Gambino
@greatgambino.eth
but also. This is a commonality in everyone I've seen earn the USDC lol
5 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
priyanka 🦉
@priyanka
enh maybe true for some/most but not all. v doesn't follow me and i was a recipient yesterday.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Breech 🎩🍖Ⓜ️
@breech
But Jesse does, DWR does, etc. EVERY single recipient yesterday has follows from those accounts. It's not even debatable tbh. If that's the system they chose, so be it, but "look, he has less than 1000 followers" isn't relevant when the REASON they were a recipient of the $5 reward was because of engagement FROM those OG accounts. You won't see a small account that doesn't have follows from them ever win this reward, unless the system is changed.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
priyanka 🦉
@priyanka
if i had more time on hand i would look into the past week’s history of that user to see who engaged with them, but i don’t. i also don’t know how to haha. all to say i respond(like my brain absorbs info) better to stats and numbers over theory or assumptions of what went behind figuring out the top 100. if someone has already done this and i missed it, i’d love to check it out.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Gambino
@greatgambino.eth
That would be interesting to see. What I’m curious about is I’m pretty sure I have a lot of bot followers (powerbadge and a degen allowance attracted a lot of them) and I’m wondering if that has a negative impact since it inflates my follower count with trash
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
priyanka 🦉
@priyanka
yeah the active followers ratio thing definitely affects our score. naomi's score is much higher then everyone else bc her content isn't the type that attracts bots nor was she on the follow list like ted was (?) = likely to have more real people who are active following = higher score.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
