After the heretic detour yesterday, I'm back to blathering about strict global consensus

After the heretic detour yesterday, I'm back to blathering about strict global consensus

https://polynya.mirror.xyz/7pV8nHi9P0JNuS6kwB1Qvko2_eQrv1628IXLFEmOYb0

Here you go: https://polynya.mirror.xyz/J4h5zqxmF1wRFXIAjrVnaayrH-GSoHdzl7xqR5aNFGY

Hi polyna
I've been a reader for a while and wanted to say thanks! Your articles helped keeping me sane! :D
I was wondering if you have any articles which go a bit more in depth into your usage of the terms subjectivity/objectivity? Cheers!

Really not a crank, but I do view dystopia as the already existing framework between things Chokepoint 1&2.0 (unbanking politically unpopular ways of making a living, police asset seizure laws, ever increasing KYC real reporting conditions and real proposed changes, etc. And that’s just US. Imho this framework…1/2

Freedom Factory | @ethos Ethereum mobile operating system. North maxi.🏰

Everything you have said is equally applicable for the specific usecase quoted - USDT or USDC

Indeed, a well-designed democratic CBDC using ZKPs will be a significant step forward over USDT or USDC status quo

Crypto-native assets (not stablecoins) like BTC or ETH also useful in the rare worst-case scenarios

Good question - it depends on the NFT. If you want to make it a globally accessible, tradeable collectible, then yes. But a lot of NFTs don't need that and are only relevant within their specific communities or applications - so those don't.

Do you think that NFTs need a strict global consensus?