Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/walletbeat
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Some wallets use the label "staking" to refer to the act of handing over your coins to a custodian who will turn around and stake them. Is this label correct? Staking may have been the user's goal, but the "handing over the coins" part feels too critical to not be reflected in the action's label. Am I off-base here?
3 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
This is the video that brought me to this observation. It calls this action "Regular staking", but doesn't seem regular at all to me. It also goes as far as calling this action a "position", which feels even further removed from what "staking" actually means. https://warpcast.com/whatax/0x2eab4c6e
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

accountless.eth pfp
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
if they get staked, imo, it is staking. 'how' it is done, is just implementation.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
This is true, but even as a solo home staker maxi, I can acknowledge that some dependencies are illegible to me. Yes, it's basically UI sugar hiding a swap. But I'm not as offended b/c staking always means 'something is at stake' i.e. you are taking on some risk to get some reward. The only question is what & where do the risks come from?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction