learning that people can’t imagine how things look or don’t have an internal monologue is like discovering a new species. literally wtf how do you live like this

🔍 ensdata.net ✦ 🖼️ pugson.net/rfe ✦  🌐 metadata.vision ✦ 𝙿𝚁𝙴𝚅: @rainbow 🌈

I honestly thought people were trolling but it feels like too many people are in on the joke for it to be fake 🫨

I have something like this, I think, and only realized it within the past couple years. When I read or write, I “visualize” things in a sense, but it’s not really “visual.” Like, if a book describes a grassy field full of flowers, I don’t see it in my mind unless I stop reading and force myself to envision it. And even then, it’s hazy and vague. But I do have some other version of a “visual,” it’s just not visual in nature. Like, I have the feeling and sense of exactly what that image is like. Just non-visual

Mathematics/Design ⟢⟢ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟡⟡ᚖ⟣⟣

Text art: linktr.ee/sinusoidalsnail

Merely three-dimensional visual accuracy is quite a low-pass filter compared to conjuring higher-dimensional creative space. Subtle objects being “visible” in this context is how I resonate with what I read you as saying Sine. If so, I kind of feel this way in my minds eye 👁️ too.

🐵 ← 🙈🙉🙊 → /phil →  phil.cockfield.net, db.team →  
ƒ(🌳) →  🧫 /sys  ←  @cell <T> 🧠🐦‍⬛, 100% human cartoon

Zap it in Sine!!! I need every <PersonByte> and squishy brain bit I can get!!!!🧠🌸