醓 on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

seneca pfp

>> is part of the biggest voting block that has been the decision maker for most props in recent times >> does not undermine idea of nouns gov as decentralized >> nounders vote >> ok NOW this undermines idea of nouns gov being decentralized

3 replies

0 recast

20 reactions

Fattybuthappy pfp

It is just weird voting for with such a objectively bad written proposal: no good CC0 licencing just mention, not past funding mention, no proliferation clear plan just mention it will be promoted vaguely having awful past results. Personally would have understandd it and even voted for full price cost apparently 30% more if it was more clear and not so faulty.

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

@seneca just flexing to show who's got the final word. Cool, we see it. 😂 Although, some of us aren't exactly quaking in our boots. ✌️👀

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

When it comes to “aligned friends” they’re rolling out the red carpet and firing up the big guns 🔫 but somehow still forgot to mention that Noun 456 was gifted for contributions, including Nouns Terminal. Classic 😂

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Wondering how many gifts we should toss at their aligned friends for a product nobody even touches 🎁😂. What’s next? Asking us to cover their taxes too, like some of our other “generous” pals?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Fattybuthappy pfp

Do not think it is a final word kind of thing from @seneca or nouners since is their votes that they did not sold and can do what they please but definetly weird precedent or else will you be given 34 eth and a 3 digit noun if people just do one winning bid on your client does not seem very competitive nor efficient and definitely sustanciates your suspicions

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

醓 pfp

The winning bid was from nouns sh team lol I think the amount of 9e seems fair for the intern tho

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Fattybuthappy pfp

Deam this i imagined but if you confirmed just makes me sad, i mean i am not against paying intern at all would even pay full quota as apparently this prop is 30% discount rate but phrasing and writing prop is so wrong to have passed

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Bring out the big guns just to pass a 9 ETH prop? Yeah, that just screams suspicious. Pushing it through feels more like sabotage than support, especially if we’re aiming for official non-profit status. They’re definitely going to be looking at these kinds of moves.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

醓 pfp

Dude its a 9e retro prop

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Exactly. We’ve seen plenty of similar props get ignored in the past, but now, with folks actively working toward non-profit and charity status, some pushing these through feels like they’re just throwing up hurdles. Because yes, they can't do what they have done before under that status.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction