Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

>> is part of the biggest voting block that has been the decision maker for most props in recent times
>> does not undermine idea of nouns gov as decentralized

>> nounders vote
>> ok NOW this undermines idea of nouns gov being decentralized

if we didn't intend to be part of the org, we would have ran the '21 playbook: don't take supply, hard code % of proceeds and pretend like you care.

Professional failer #lovemaximalist
https://linktr.ee/fattybuthappy
Trust Me
https://matias.me/nsfw/

(Plz do not dm about my votes)

fair take. everyone is entitled to their own opinion on the prop.

It is just weird voting for with such a objectively bad written proposal: no good CC0 licencing just mention, not past funding mention, no proliferation clear plan just mention it will be promoted vaguely having awful past results. Personally would have understandd it and even voted for full price cost apparently 30% more if it was more clear and not so faulty.

accelerating agritech. empowering communities. ending hunger.
Founder: theCityFarmers.org

| sovereign | post-rich | 🇺🇸/acc | remilio

it's bizarre to me how you conclude "impropriety", "duty of loyalty" and "lack of care to the mission" from nounders exercising their vote on a straightforward retro prop for a relatively small sum

i haven’t been a Nouncillor for a few months, i have no ability to vote there

in my mind, Nouncil is roughly equivalent to the Bonfire Guild just more members, hence more voting weight. it’s 40+ people (43 on this prop) controlling 37 votes

if Nouns is moving in the direction it seems to be moving in, the appearance of impropriety and duty of loyalty & care to the mission of the organization are going to become critically important for the Nounders as scrutiny increases