Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

>> is part of the biggest voting block that has been the decision maker for most props in recent times
>> does not undermine idea of nouns gov as decentralized

>> nounders vote
>> ok NOW this undermines idea of nouns gov being decentralized

i haven’t been a Nouncillor for a few months, i have no ability to vote there

in my mind, Nouncil is roughly equivalent to the Bonfire Guild just more members, hence more voting weight. it’s 40+ people (43 on this prop) controlling 37 votes

if Nouns is moving in the direction it seems to be moving in, the appearance of impropriety and duty of loyalty & care to the mission of the organization are going to become critically important for the Nounders as scrutiny increases

accelerating agritech. empowering communities. ending hunger.
 https://cityfarmers.xyz

these are specific legal terms that apply and have implications regardless of the specific proposal

please note that i did not say “lack” of care

it's bizarre to me how you conclude "impropriety", "duty of loyalty" and "lack of care to the mission" from nounders exercising their vote on a straightforward retro prop for a relatively small sum