Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
seneca
@seneca
>> is part of the biggest voting block that has been the decision maker for most props in recent times >> does not undermine idea of nouns gov as decentralized >> nounders vote >> ok NOW this undermines idea of nouns gov being decentralized
3 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
Fattybuthappy
@fattybuthappy
It is just weird voting for with such a objectively bad written proposal: no good CC0 licencing just mention, not past funding mention, no proliferation clear plan just mention it will be promoted vaguely having awful past results. Personally would have understandd it and even voted for full price cost apparently 30% more if it was more clear and not so faulty.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
@seneca just flexing to show who's got the final word. Cool, we see it. 😂 Although, some of us aren't exactly quaking in our boots. ✌️👀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
When it comes to “aligned friends” they’re rolling out the red carpet and firing up the big guns 🔫 but somehow still forgot to mention that Noun 456 was gifted for contributions, including Nouns Terminal. Classic 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
Wondering how many gifts we should toss at their aligned friends for a product nobody even touches 🎁😂. What’s next? Asking us to cover their taxes too, like some of our other “generous” pals?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
