Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Update: the administrative proposal to update the Revenue Chair Waterfall is now live and needs 40 votes to start the term for @pichi https://nouns.build/dao/base/0x8de71d80eE2C4700bC9D4F8031a2504Ca93f7088/vote/14?tab=votes
2 replies
6 recasts
42 reactions

KMac๐ŸŒ โฉ pfp
KMac๐ŸŒ โฉ
@kmacb.eth
Looks a bit difficult ie [object, Object]. How best to simulate this transaction? @pichi what did you use to confirm this was good to go? gc
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I assumed this was just the follow up to the previous proposal and making the new waterfall official.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac๐ŸŒ โฉ pfp
KMac๐ŸŒ โฉ
@kmacb.eth
Yeah thatโ€™s ๐Ÿ’ฏ true. It moves money so Iโ€™d like to simulate it before voting for it which is a no brainer if it actually does what the proposal says it will do. Reasonably low risk & easy e vote to revert. The effort to simulate this may be too high to actually do before deploying๐Ÿ˜†. Thinking itโ€™s a good practice though so asked if you had figured it out
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction