Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you don’t like the “make money” consumer value prop for Farcaster—what do you think is better? Reply with a suggestion and rationale. Like replies that resonate.
154 replies
80 recasts
475 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I always thought of Farcaster as a place where I’m not the product. I pay to be here and I own my data. My usage and habits aren’t being collected to be repackaged and used against me at a later date. I can’t be de-platformed, censored, or silenced. I can build what I want on top of the protocol and not worry that my access will be turned off because of a whim or impending IPO. This is the easiest and most familiar way to get into social Web3.
4 replies
6 recasts
72 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
I think this narrative needs a lot of development to land, but I think it's the right one. I think educating ppl why they need to onboard is the most important step in cultivating the right culture. "Come to make money" promotes a different culture, even if making money is actually part of the value prop.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Bullers
@db
Agree with you here, always been my feeling, BUT the current approach is better for attracting more users. People don’t care about privacy or data ownership
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
I love this narrative and wish it was more true about farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Taylor Sizemore
@taylorsizemore.eth
I think this is great because: - even if you don't know, they are curious now - if they aren't curious they don't get to join (good) - this rhetoric is out there now, and people are looking for signs pointing them in the right direction - sounds like it might be drawing other likeminded people (accurate) - doesn't mention crypto or money - being fair, uncensored and not exploitive, both sounds good and describes the protocol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
