Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you donโ€™t like the โ€œmake moneyโ€ consumer value prop for Farcasterโ€”what do you think is better? Reply with a suggestion and rationale. Like replies that resonate.
154 replies
92 recasts
516 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I always thought of Farcaster as a place where Iโ€™m not the product. I pay to be here and I own my data. My usage and habits arenโ€™t being collected to be repackaged and used against me at a later date. I canโ€™t be de-platformed, censored, or silenced. I can build what I want on top of the protocol and not worry that my access will be turned off because of a whim or impending IPO. This is the easiest and most familiar way to get into social Web3.
4 replies
5 recasts
69 reactions

Bullers pfp
Bullers
@db
Agree with you here, always been my feeling, BUT the current approach is better for attracting more users. People donโ€™t care about privacy or data ownership
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
The average normies donโ€™t care. But this place isnโ€™t ready for them yet.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

faraday pfp
faraday
@faraday
https://warpcast.com/faraday/0x9fa79d48 this is where iโ€™m confused
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I think not enough people know about this place.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction