Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
tfw /nouns-retro is filled with funded builders executing their proposals. nouns-retro should be reserved for unfunded proliferation imo I get that farming $nouns in /nouns isn't as rewarding but cmon @seneca maybe we need some parameters established and enforced by moderators?
5 replies
1 recast
26 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
i feel this -- i usually make a point of not posting camp stuff in /nouns-retro _unless_ its something we consider a side-thing maybe i post in /nouns though bc i think it makes sense to highlight new features etc, but i could see why it rubs ppl wrong there too
5 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
on the other hand, if it acts as a driver to get ppl to post/share/document their props its not the worst and a small cost lots of ifs but just being mindful there is an element of dont miss the forest for the trees here
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
maybe that channel just isn't working as intended
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
ya that seems like a fair takeaway regardless
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction