Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter Kim pfp
Peter Kim
@peter
@perl announcement: Starting from tomorrow’s round (the round we post today), we will be filtering out the engagement of users that have placed a wager on a round.

 For example, if you place a pick, your likes will not count towards the round’s total to promote a fair game for everyone.
38 replies
14 recasts
99 reactions
Q🎩 pfp
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
Is this not tipping the scales toward LESS. If anyone betting in the round can’t like, then the pool of possible like just got cut massively. I think it could also impact the participation of creator drops during Perl rounds. It almost acts as a negative. Just thoughts. It’ll balance eventually.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
oh shit this is gonna be hard
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Alex Mack 🎩 pfp
Alex Mack 🎩
@alexmack
Whoa, this is taking out a huge amount of the engagement tho hey? Will be interesting
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jon 🎩👽 pfp
Jon 🎩👽
@commstark
nooooo that's what makes it so much fun nooooooooooo... .... then again, you guys try and we'll see how it goes. this isn't brain surgery no one is dying i'm willing to try new things and not take things to seriously all at once
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
3070 ↑↗ ✈︎ 🎩-' pfp
3070 ↑↗ ✈︎ 🎩-'
@3070.eth
wait what.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sylve 🎩👑 pfp
Sylve 🎩👑
@sylvehunter
Make sense, I agree with this update, It's gonna be unpredictable but it's fair Now we can call it gambling ❤
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mohammed Shaik 🎩 pfp
Mohammed Shaik 🎩
@smdshaik
Woww 😯😯 you are making my minds blown let's see how the game goes now excited. Just want to discuss something why sometimes I see there less likes will be showing in wrapcast as compared to the likes which I used to see in farcaster how the likes is calculated I hadn't got it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kevin 🎩 pfp
Kevin 🎩
@kevinc
Great update, think this helps balances it a lot more.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gcmac pfp
gcmac
@gcmac
Admire the changes you guys are making and the willingness to experiment. Would kill to play around with the data set you guys have of peoples bets and then associating them with outcomes haha
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 q/tips pfp
agrimony↑🎩 q/tips
@agrimony
Yeah I usually bet on more just because I can contribute to it lol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
niftyswaps.eth 🎩🍖 pfp
niftyswaps.eth 🎩🍖
@niftyswaps.eth
Great idea this is a game changer 👀 What happens when 100% of users are playing @perl tho?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cdub12 pfp
Cdub12
@chrisw
Makes sense to make this more fair. Good update
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Shooooo pfp
Shooooo
@shooooo
As if I’m not more addicted, this levels the playing field!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tmophoto🎩 pfp
Tmophoto🎩
@tmophoto
is it likes on a top post or all posts for that user for the day? I am having a hard time seeing the numbers that some people are getting on individual posts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Soskid.eth🔮🎩🍖🟣 pfp
Soskid.eth🔮🎩🍖🟣
@soskid
You’re saying the lies of people would wager won’t count?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🌈 grant 🎩 🐸 pfp
🌈 grant 🎩 🐸
@grunt.eth
This is the opposite of /skininthegame 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Walleteer 🎩🔵🧾 pfp
Walleteer 🎩🔵🧾
@walleteer.eth
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere: Will the realtime results on perl.xyz reflect the excluded “likes”? i.e., the realtime score will only reflect non-perl participation?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bullduck 🔮 pfp
Bullduck 🔮
@bullduck
@peter How about giving chance of changing votes before poll starts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ujjwal Kumar pfp
Ujjwal Kumar
@ujjwalujjwalkujj
That's what I was thinking of! Good dude
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions