Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
I’m e/acc in crypto but decel in AI
6 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

π’‚­_π’‚­ pfp
π’‚­_π’‚­
@m-j-r.eth
I don't see a material reason why both aren't net good in the long run.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
Personally, I don’t believe AGI is possible. However, I still think AI safety is needed and we shouldn’t move fast and break things as e/acc advocate suggest.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

π’‚­_π’‚­ pfp
π’‚­_π’‚­
@m-j-r.eth
I think AGI is moot if we already know the underlying body of knowledge to prolifically public, and we know that further public transparency in other aspects of civilization leads to safer outcomes. furthermore, while there's support for "bureaucratic control" safety, finetuning can bypass this. why shouldn't we adapt?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
Thoughtful replies like yours is what makes Farcaster so great for discussing controversial topics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction