Owocki
@owocki
is the meta on farcaster the same as on twitter? Post a divisive hot take + bask in the viral clout as people devour each other in the comments section?
11 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
๐ _๐ฃ๐ _๐
@m-j-r
no, it's more like post a divisive hot take -> get socratic dialogue'd to enlightenment.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Do you eat kiwi with the skin on? That was farcasters most divisive moment
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
Nah, generally more respectful and optimistic over here. Possibly to the detriment of FC growth. ๐
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
DAO Jones
@dao-jones
As said, more constructive. The meta has been good old โinteresting ideasโ and โcool stuffโ Now with open registration, hopefully the influx of low quality accounts and engagement doesnโt change things for the worse. The trajectory of innocent and straightforward meta might not be a straight line anywayโฆ
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wave
@lk
I think what you described will come at scale
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Not necessarily. Thereโs no ad model so no one is trying to incentivize eyeballs. Well reasoned replies are welcomed, channels being the best of Reddit, and โquote tweetโ to ratio someone comes with added friction, intentionally
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mac Budkowski แต
@macbudkowski
It works from time to time but generally we play positive sum games here
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
billzh
@billzh
Depends on your answer to this question: do you eat kiwis with skin on?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Frank
@deboboy
nope
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
โwoj
@woj.eth
yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
696๐ฉ
@6969
The opposite
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
