Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Noun 730 | Based & Optimistic Ξthereum Ξnjoyoor | founder @thenounsquare, Zero Rights Reserved Podcast (ZEROPOD.xyz) & the /yellow collective on Base | ⌐◨-◨ 🟡

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/ 

Founder of Spark Ecosystems builder of deresy.xyz and hyperminter.xyz. Collector of art. Lover of music. Sunrise 🌄, Sunset 🌅, No Sweat - Ken Kesey

Voting with rationale within the first few hours of a live prop should give you some sort of delegate flex. 

WDYT @peterpandam @toadyhawk.eth @ccarella.eth @nounishprof @noun40 @seneca @parkermccurley  @jonruth  ?

Doing Nounish, Optimistic and Based thangz

No — I think we put way too much emphasis on vwr. And the revote thing is so lackadaisical. If I think it’s important, I’ll write a whole blog post with my reasoning (and have) and may vote early as well. Sometimes it’s just not necessary. Voting already takes an extensive amount of time. Being expected to write an amazing reason every time is way too much to ask. 

If I think I have a unique perspective that will be valuable for others you’ll see it. But I don’t think we need to celebrate it or reward it.

Crypto, nouns, malleable software, interfaces, running. // working on @agora // https://0xmcg.com // /the-pond

I rarely read them unless it is a prop I need clarity on. I get most of my info from reading the prop itself, asking questions of the proposer, and the dicussion in Nouncil. My bigger point is if you incentivize vwr you will likely get less quality vwr not higher quality. Show me the incentive, I'll show you the outcome as they say.

We definitely should celebrate VWR, helping explain the nuances of a prop to inform voters is important. I read every VWR and appreciate those who spend the time explaining their thinking