Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
How can we enable Nouns to effectively allocate resources without requiring people to vote all the time :D
10 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
i think the recent @rounds experiments have been a good UX improvement on this dimension. ppl just use farcaster as they normally would and eth retro just happens. need to scale more stuff like this
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Agree good experiment but still feels kind like voting.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
once it becomes more like youtube views than twitter likes it might feel even less like voting? don’t have farcaster clients like that yet though but might soon
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
another example btw that's launching soon is client incentives (https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/28ONBDu7kti7cYBFBnEKgktxzuelvhuxu_jtGw9YrdU) basically allocate funding by *usage*. ppl just continue to vote using their client of choice or engage with the auction as normal and part of the funding happens through it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
It's a "show, don't tell" problem. By show I mostly mean something measurable both qualitative and quantitative. We're all voting all the time with our time, actions and money. We can leverage that to surface the winners and allocate resources accordingly whether there is a human in the loop or not.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction