Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Hi Network State peeps! Do you happen to know if Network States also propose concrete governance mechanisms? I'm operating under the belief that they more describe values and vehicles for Network States, not a thesis on how governance should work. https://warpcast.com/nor/0x129dd812
7 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
i think, network state is framework that is agnostic of any governance structure as long as there is some governance structure (anarchy not allowed)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
so then is the primary innovation the values that it upholds if not the dynamics it enshrines? what about the "single recognizable founder" component. One could argue that's essentially the governance mechanism of a local dictator.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

grin pfp
grin
@grin
It’s more “spiritual leader” than “dictator”
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
vibecamp leans heavily into co-creation, so i think 'founder' can be easily miscontrued as a governance category vs 'person who started it'
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
yeah it is interesting that the founder/ceo role is part of specification yet the governance mechanism they bring is undefined
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction