Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/negationgame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
https://warpcast.com/accountless.eth/0x58b31c17
1 reply
19 recasts
80 reactions

EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc pfp
EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Explain relevance to negation game
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
the inability to govern the trademark in a credibly neutral way caused them to choose no governance at all
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Of course, they don't have to govern it. Maybe in this case the ecosystem is better off without a trademark. But there might come a day when zk has so much clout that everyone calls their thing zk even though it's not or it's implemented poorly.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gökhan Turhan pfp
Gökhan Turhan
@gokhan.eth
1. succinct is not zk 2. we do not need defensive trademarking here. otherwise i'd have already trademarked "block" and "chain". 3. it was purely because of their ZK ticker. 4. they "had to" withdraw because of a real de facto governance that also include the inventors/ discoverers of many ZK tech, and math thereof.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction