Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. whatā€™s the point?
32 replies
8 recasts
119 reactions

Nick Naraghi šŸ§¢ ā†‘ pfp
Nick Naraghi šŸ§¢ ā†‘
@nintynick.eth
All the value accrues to the social graph (Metcalfeā€™s law) As long as itā€™s actually open, itā€™s win-win
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

llamafacts pfp
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
What about this? https://warpcast.com/llamafacts.eth/0x486ceb84
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick Naraghi šŸ§¢ ā†‘ pfp
Nick Naraghi šŸ§¢ ā†‘
@nintynick.eth
@alfafrens is a good experiment in this direction - uses farcaster accounts but creates a separate graph of connections Ultimately usage and integration grows the protocol, so thatā€™s ā€œgiving backā€ by itself
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

llamafacts pfp
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
Ok I see they only have login with farcaster that's good. And also, if the protocol definitely doesn't give them the tools they need it's ok to build their own. I'm taking about clients that only partially integrante with farcaster and that could just detach from it if they grow enough.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction