nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
You should not have to pay to use farcaster
9 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Maxbrain Capital
@viybz
That’s fair. How does FC continue to build and develop?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Brad Michelson
@bradmichelson
replying so i can remember to come back to see the debate in the comments.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ox.crypto
@ox-crypto
And where the team fund the project? I don't really want to see unwanted ads here tbh.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ABUBAKAR TANKO
@abubakartanko
I think the same, maybe when we are plenty enough, they will switch that off
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
antaur ↑
@antaur.eth
You should - or stay in web2 and keep eating eat mind pollution and remain the product
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NotificOcean: Blockchain Alerts
@notificocean
I think it’s good against bots
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wws
@wws1337
but would they return the money to people who already paid their 5 bucks? Although it seems unfair for new and eager users to meet such barrier, I think making a payment to join leaves only interested in this project people here, no? Moreover it kind of stops the sybils to take advantage of the app
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
I don't mind paying but I can see why others wouldn't (mostly ability, conditioning or self-entitlement IMO). Bills need to get paid though. So how can we reward those who choose to support adoption by paying extra, without it becoming a zero-sum game?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kaitoren.eth
@kaitoren.eth
No different than email: 1) Run your own server at your own cost 2) Pay a host directly (AOL, Earthlink, Proton) 3) Let an App subsidize the cost (Gmail/Hotmail/Proton)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
