Kiran pfp
Kiran
@neuroswish
voice-first products are insanely overhyped. anything that requires you to explicitly talk to it is strictly worse than just having a screen. the idea of having "an AI assistant you can just walk around with talk to" is useless
5 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Kiran pfp
Kiran
@neuroswish
"oh but you can walk up to a building and ask the AI what you're looking at, and it can provide you with cool facts!" when the hell have I ever needed to do that
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
As β€œproducts” become more like β€œtalking to a friend or colleague”, there will be more and more people that like it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
I use my google home very frequently, so I can see the value in having voice assistants
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Colin Johnson πŸ’­ pfp
Colin Johnson πŸ’­
@cojo.eth
πŸ’― Humans absorb much more information much more quickly through visual input. And we don’t need extra volume cluttering our airwaves from people at all points in time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
agreed, my ideal interface is still buttons. the current paradigm just can't dispose of the inconvenience of holding the buttons & visual output in a certain orientation that remains slightly strenous. massive improvement compared to 20 years ago, still hasn't arrived at the point.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction