Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
29 recasts
174 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
instead of person A, B + C casting about topic Y in their own siloes (which happens), it’d be better — for them and for the network — if A, B, C casted in one place and engaged w/ each other. Bluesky, TikTok algo etc. make it easy to discover discussions on specific topics. hard here, so topics don’t grow.
5 replies
9 recasts
71 reactions

Ribin Ruck pfp
Ribin Ruck
@na
im doing this without the formalism. just tag https://warpcast.com/na/0x981042c3
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
sorry I’m not getting it. What’re you doing?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ribin Ruck pfp
Ribin Ruck
@na
when making a new cast you can use the thread composer to tag whoever might be interested, or add comments to tag whoever might be interested. after a few times they'll know your signal and reciprocate i think
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ribin Ruck pfp
Ribin Ruck
@na
tho most of the times the convo ends up in group chats and not in public spaces, maybe because people think ideas are worth something idk
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction