july

Fatter tails on upside outcomes via Internet distribution implies quantity of reps matter more than quality

Quantity of reps going up implies median quality of rep going down, but it also implies improved quality of rep through repeated practice

Where is the free market of human activity going to lead us?

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /creators and /cameron. dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

I wrote my master's seminar paper on the intersection of team size, happiness, and productivity. One of the things I learned was that 1) happiness and productivity are connected, and 2) smaller teams often are happier, but 3) a large enough team will still out produce even if everyone is miserable.

/fieldway: sufficiently decentralized team leadership.

CoinDesk Director of Product Management.

Casts are my own and don't represent anyone but me.

So quantity wins, /depending on what you're measuring./ If you're measuring quality, it doesn't necessarily.

Not yet. For the work I do (product management, among other things), AI is like a junior person who doesn't learn, and it can't build relationships and trust with people. For professions built on interaction and interpreting human behavior, it doesn't suffice. But, it DOES help me do more better as an IC.

Fascinating!

I taught leadership at the U.S. Army’s officer candidate school so org theory stuff is like catnip to me

Do you think LLMs effectively give everyone an infinitely large team?