Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Feels like a common problem for Farcaster. I think Warpcast has done a good job with curation and spam reduction... But in the process it hasn't stimulated a "conversation culture". You don't get any direct reputation value out of replying to ppl's casts. So ppl just QC instead. Making lots of low quality replies also punishes you, which is good. It's cut down on the pointless +1 replies. What we don't have is any incentive to actually start real conversations with ppl. To reply to ppl to give them validation we liked their post. Basically there's no mechanic that rewards friendships. On a platform that is hyper focused on reward incentives, having the most important activity be the least incentivized is what results in users feeling like they are "shouting into the void". Warpcast is doing great things, but what's really needed is to make conversations great again. Ideas, anyone?
5 replies
3 recasts
19 reactions

Matthew McDowell-Sweet pfp
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
The mechanic for rewarding friendships and interactions are the friendships and interactions themselves, no? The network-protocol-client-whatever can facilitate it but it’s ultimately on the end users to 1) recognise the inherent value of talking to people and 2) interact and sustain relationships.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
I feel if you want to bootstrap a new social graph you have to think about these dynamics and come up with creative solutions. Maybe it's just on the social layer, but any good event planner knows that "good conversations" don't just happen naturally. There has to be an environment that encourages it, and I describe several of the environmental factors that are actively working against the intrinsic motivation for ppl to connect in a way that fosters good conversation.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Matthew McDowell-Sweet pfp
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
One thing that this place has going for it is link positivity. Culture is referential and if the pointers are only ever internal the discourse gets stale fast. I know what you mean about the event planner thing. But what does “good conversation” feel / look like to you? Any examples from here, or from other places?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

peth.eth pfp
peth.eth
@peth
its not about what the good conversation feels or looks like, but about making sure there are as many conversations as possible so the real question is how to facilitate it - good event hosts know how to start conversations, usually by introducing people to people they think they would vibe with
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
I agree, I think there are several great things going for Warpcast! Link positivity is def one. Great point that encouraging ppl to share things in a pro-social way is really positive towards building connections. I actually think I have lots of great conversations on Warpcast. This is turning into one of them! Thanks for engaging! 🙏 But it took me a year of grinding it out to build up a solid social rep to get ppl engaging with me. I think that's the key: reducing that cold-start problem. I think Ted's working on the same ideas: https://warpcast.com/ted/0x495d5667
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction