Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monteluna
@monteluna
Going through the Berachain POL v1.1 proposal. A short and sweet on first glance: 1. Cut BGT emissions as a whole. 2. Redirect some of the cuts into subsidizing major BERA pairs to drive removing BERA from the market and locking into LP (BERA-HONEY, BERA-wBTC, etc). 3. BGT boost incentives should only be in BERA, and take a cut of these incentives to be owned directly by the chain as Chain Owned Liquidity. It's like if the Ethereum Foundation took a page out of OlympusDAO and market made it's own DEX with an enshrined on-chain Aerodrome using the chain's native token. Do not be distracted by the Berabaddies anon. There's some good stuff on chain here. https://forum.berachain.com/t/pol-v1-1-bera-in-control/107
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Carl Gustaf 👨🏼💻
@0xbob
A very welcome change. I’m happy to see that they understood the current situation need to be changed and making changes with $BERA capture 🤩
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gegè
@eichenkundiger
feel like bera is a good degen farm chain and cool to experiment due to POL design but I don‘t see how serious businesses will b building on top of it i.e. how it will get adoption outside of gamblers
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Davide
@0xdavide
In my opinion it is essential to include BERA as main token both as pools and APR. Many people use ETH, BeraETH, BTC, etc. pools to farm BGT, redeem and sell. If emissions are reduced there, it is better for BERA price action. Those who use BERA/BGT pools should be rewarded (as is happening) but if emissions need to be reduced... better to lower APR for external pools.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
