Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monteluna
@monteluna
Going through the Berachain POL v1.1 proposal. A short and sweet on first glance: 1. Cut BGT emissions as a whole. 2. Redirect some of the cuts into subsidizing major BERA pairs to drive removing BERA from the market and locking into LP (BERA-HONEY, BERA-wBTC, etc). 3. BGT boost incentives should only be in BERA, and take a cut of these incentives to be owned directly by the chain as Chain Owned Liquidity. It's like if the Ethereum Foundation took a page out of OlympusDAO and market made it's own DEX with an enshrined on-chain Aerodrome using the chain's native token. Do not be distracted by the Berabaddies anon. There's some good stuff on chain here. https://forum.berachain.com/t/pol-v1-1-bera-in-control/107
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
gegè
@eichenkundiger
feel like bera is a good degen farm chain and cool to experiment due to POL design but I don‘t see how serious businesses will b building on top of it i.e. how it will get adoption outside of gamblers
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monteluna
@monteluna
Time will tell. I think this is better than pure Ethereum since the chain is actually aligned with financial incentives to supply capital and grow liquidity. I really only supply funds to Aerodrome these days for lock reasons, but I have yet to see a good reason to supply liquidity on any other chain or L2. I also don't generally engage in memecoins or gamblefi. Just majors supplying LP to WETH pairs focusing on defi apps.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
