Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
two major discussions during today's dev call network architecture: @v presented an outline of the plan for snapchain, a pretty significant departure from the current consensus model which is showing signs of performance issues as the network grows while the proposed data structure is not a "blockchain", the protocol is inching towards questions of governance and security that are inherent to blockchains channels: @dwr.eth gave a sneak peek into the redesign of channels, which are currently not meeting the mark as curated cozy corners. details still pretty sparse, but the major change is that owners/mods will need to explicitly invite users to post in a channel, with the goal of cultivating higher signal and quality
11 replies
5 recasts
44 reactions
zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
ty for this
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CarCulture ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
CarCulture ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ”ต
@drivr
Was happy to hear decentralization is on target
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Apurv pfp
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
the bit on channels does make sense . next evolution could actually be enabling mods to set certain criteria to enable folks to post in channels - past power badge holder , proof of good posts in the past etc. or may be ask users to stake tokens that get burnt if algo deems it low quality ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas Walsh pfp
Thomas Walsh
@thomaswalsh
Really interested to see how this pan out. Curious about the new channel format
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GGPUKA pfp
GGPUKA
@sabit520
2 $hunt
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Olha Somochkina pfp
Olha Somochkina
@messsori
it`s good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐Ÿ’—Crypto Boy๐Ÿ’— pfp
๐Ÿ’—Crypto Boy๐Ÿ’—
@vikkisahu
Coo kch
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DiNo pfp
DiNo
@khunglong
nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tititi pfp
Tititi
@tititi
good information
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cryptotvplus pfp
Cryptotvplus
@cryptotvplus1
Nice one
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
filmigaane pfp
filmigaane
@filmigaane
good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction