Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MegaRock pfp
MegaRock
@megarock
What it is the meaning behind L2 "deriving security" of L1? In other words: How does submitting proofs/snarks to L1 makes L2s secure?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Kromsten pfp
Kromsten
@kromsten
👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael pfp
Michael
@michael
Imagine a L1 as a constantly growing, huge blob of glass. Every few mins you add a new blob of liquid glass on top, it hardens, and makes it so that no one can mess with the deeper layers without causing a bunch of very visible damage.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Emmanuel🦉⌐◨-◨🎩🍥 pfp
Emmanuel🦉⌐◨-◨🎩🍥
@emmanuel
> L2 "deriving security" of L1 common misconception and marketing material. L2 doesn't "derive security" of L1, the foreign asset bridged from the L1 is provided with safe guards that allow it to exit via the bridge on the L1. 1/n
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction