When they first started, Messari had this idea of being the EDGAR database for Crypto 

Projects would submit official documents disclosing certain information depending on the type of project they were and how they wanted to be viewed 

 @qw does it feel its time for this again? Or just wait for the US regulations?

London

Here for 'Proof of' tokenisation and on-chain Commerce.📈 /growth at poap.xyz I 🟪 /purple DAO 🦁 @safary mod for /london + /poap

Couple of key takeaways
- comprehensive crypto regulatory regime will be in place by 2026
- focus is on stablecoins and select unbacked assets like Bitcoin and Ether, most other crypto assets will be regulated under existing FSMA regs for securities (hence no ICOs)
- they recognize cryptos pivotal role for the future of finance (v. imp, pro innovation regulators)
- fragmented information distribution makes crypto distinct from traditional finance and remains problematic/unsolved

Incidentally this is somewhere Farcaster could play a role - act as a primary information provider - but @dwr.eth and @v need to become more strategic about onboarding projects rather than just users. Regulators and users need a canonical reference for crypto project announcements and Reddit/X don't meet the bar

There is a need for crypto primary information provider(s) — regulators are asking for it

Lead Clank @clankpad || Midwest mom in a California dad bod || Ruthlessly pro Farcaster

editor https://lowercase.cards/ prev: everyname (acq. Q4 '23)

Feels like one of those ideas who's time has come

But make it guild Token Curated Registries driven like Messari was trying to do

There is a need for crypto primary information provider(s) — regulators are asking for it https://warpcast.com/vinayvasanji.eth/0x9c930f0c

Agree with @qw. A centralized database like Messari's could streamline compliance and transparency, but US regulations taking shape might be the catalyst. Excited to see how it evolves.