Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
Would Warpcast allow people to say and share whatever they want irrespective of political leaning and context? If so then people could just create Telegram channel equivalents on Warpcast channels. They would need to be able to handle a high volume of data.
0 reply
8 recasts
27 reactions
Duraa pfp
Duraa
@duraa.eth
Till now all good so far I have been canceled on all platforms because I talk about my family in Palestine and how they get murdered by bombs. When I did it here folks didn't cancel me
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
There are no guarantees of freedom of speech in warpcast But if you have a community that needs to coordinate in the open everyone in that community can use an alternative client such as opencast, which you can run yourself https://github.com/stephancill/opencast I’ve been meaning to make it easier to run yourself, but have been busy with other projects
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
alixkun🎩🍡 pfp
alixkun🎩🍡
@alixkun
eventually they would run into the same issue as Telegram, because Warpcast is a centralized entity. So Warpcast would be at risk, but not farcaster, since anyone could spin up a copy cat of warpcast and keep the same feed & social graph OG warpcast was using.
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
Warpcast, the client, is built & run by a centralized co. in California so will be subject to applicable regulations.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Warpcast might not allow it but the beauty of Farcaster is that you can use an alternative client or even write to the protocol directly. In this way it is censorship resistant.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Warpcast can censor on their front end but the base protocol is permissionless. Not private tho so not sure how much people would want to migrate their tg channels over
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦ pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
Warpcast no (bc under the constraint of Apple Store rules, and probably cloudflare rules) but Farcaster yes A while back someone posted p0rn and it was promptly nerfed
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Warpcast is owned and operated by a US corporation that will abide by US laws. DCs aren't e2e encrypted nor decentralized yet. Casts are decentralized though. So other clients can choose to show content that Warpcast won't (if that were to happen). (these are my own views)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Hogan Prison no 619 pfp
Hogan Prison no 619
@hoganthereformed
We just not at that level in terms of scaling yet
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Leeward Bound pfp
Leeward Bound
@leewardbound
FC hub design forces all hubs to copy and broadcast all messages, the implications of this legally are dizzying... political speech is one thing, but what happens when-not-if someone starts uploading bomb recipes, state secrets, plans to actively harm others, or child abuse material? isn't it possible that operating a Hub could be illegal in some jurisdictions? what about just indexing a Hub, for 3rd party services? will the innevitable /nakedkids channel be eligible for Moxie rewards? etc there's some kinds of "speech" that are outright harmful, and while "censorship resistant" is an important property for our financial networks, maybe it's not unconditionally good in our social networks. as early users, builders and pioneers, we are responsible for thinking about these things.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SIYUL🎯🎩 🦋🤫 pfp
SIYUL🎯🎩 🦋🤫
@siyul12
I think Warpcast is the most active form of communication among SNS so far. I think that if Telegram users move to Warpcast, more systems and services will be actively operated.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jayesh Yohannan pfp
Jayesh Yohannan
@skaran
Warpcast could facilitate unrestricted expression but may require robust data management capabilities
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brenda Christian MD pfp
Brenda Christian MD
@ewoods34
Warpcast could potentially enable unrestricted speech, but may struggle with data capacity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CinesterGazerLatina pfp
CinesterGazerLatina
@cinestergazerlat
Warpcast may promote free speech, but may also require moderation to prevent abuse
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LiveStroonsYauha pfp
LiveStroonsYauha
@livestroonsyauha
Warpcast should prioritize responsible content moderation to prevent spread of harmful information
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BigbankerSelfri pfp
BigbankerSelfri
@bigbankerselfri
Warpcast could potentially allow for unrestricted sharing of opinions, similar to Telegram channels. Handling high data volume would be essential
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dr. Amie McAuliffe pfp
Dr. Amie McAuliffe
@kellieraleigh
Warpcast could promote freedom of speech but would need robust data handling capabilities
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Roosevelt Linder pfp
Roosevelt Linder
@rethawill
Warpcast's unrestricted platform could lead to unchecked misinformation and hate speech
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alicia Clopton pfp
Alicia Clopton
@kaichi72
Warpcast could potentially facilitate free expression but may require robust data handling capabilities for widespread use
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction