Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
It's interesting to consider analogies to this, where bringing some new form of a thing into existence, previous forms become infeasible... https://warpcast.com/maurelian.eth/0x60b51da7
5 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
This feels evident to me why does this surprise?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Ok, but seriously, it feels to me similar to as if you always tired a reef knot, and then one day your neighbour came up with a sheet bend (similar but different), and then somehow suddenly everytime you tried to tie a reef knot you somehow got a sheet bend.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
But we know that different contexts permit different dynamics, and that dynamics modify contexts. Famous example is aerobic respiration in cells
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
OK, I see it now. brb.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
OK, @nor. Your aerobic example makes me think this is why people are surprised.
3 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Maybe I’m not understanding it well enough. It’s just saying that there are some crystals which once created are so contaminatory that you can’t make previous crystal structures, right? Isn’t something also true for like background radiation and other kinds of pollution? Trying to understand why surprising
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

devs pfp
devs
@strat.eth
Were living things non-living things, before existing as living things? Where would the birth of life be located on the diagram?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction