Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
L3s sound great on the surface But the amount of troubleshooting I have had to do to help ppl with Zora for this frame is insane Zora Network has been around for ~ year Is part of the @optimism superchain family And has next to zero support from anything How can we in good conscious recommend L3s as viable
5 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
The exception to the rule here is that L3 UX is completely custodial , account abstracted for gas coverage and never interacts with wallets Wallets are so far away from even keeping up with todays standards that we literally can't entrust them to keep up with an ecosystem of chains that you can one click deploy
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
MJC
@mjc716
you basically say it later in the thread but I think L3s make a lot of sense as fully end-to-end integrated experiences anything short of that, you're probably better on a well-supported L2
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jay Brower (jaymothy.eth)
@jayb
The L2/L3 thesis makes sense to me if apps completely abstract away wallets with embedded tech. Onramp directly to... a network. Wallet magically appears in your app. Make it so that your user does not care what an L2 or L3 is. Second I start needing to bridge from L1 -> L2 -> L3 it's over for me
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joan
@joalavedra
Openfort ready to support ser, we should work with zora team to announce too
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DT
@decentral-think
Thank you! It's so true, and someone needed to say it sincerely. I completely agree, we're not there yet, and the L3s are not as user-friendly and operational as we would like them to be
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
