Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox π
@matthewfox
L3s sound great on the surface But the amount of troubleshooting I have had to do to help ppl with Zora for this frame is insane Zora Network has been around for ~ year Is part of the @optimism superchain family And has next to zero support from anything How can we in good conscious recommend L3s as viable
5 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Matthew Fox π
@matthewfox
The exception to the rule here is that L3 UX is completely custodial , account abstracted for gas coverage and never interacts with wallets Wallets are so far away from even keeping up with todays standards that we literally can't entrust them to keep up with an ecosystem of chains that you can one click deploy
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox π
@matthewfox
I should clarify it doesn't need to be completely custodial But if you call users "signing a msg" (click ok) to enable a session key that they do not understand what it is or what it does It may as well be considered custodial Not that this is an issue but just getting the thoughts out while they are there
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
McBain
@mcbain
Itβs almost like every technical decision has trade-offs π
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction